Ar Maw, 2006-08-08 am 17:57 +0300, ysgrifennodd Muli Ben-Yehuda:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:51:38PM +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
>
> > There's a note right above the function that explains it:
> > * NOTE! This depends on the fact that even if we _do_
> > * get an old value of "parent", we can happily dereference
> > * the pointer (it was and remains a dereferencable kernel pointer
> > * no matter what): we just can't necessarily trust the result
> > * until we know that the parent pointer is valid.
>
> Even without getting into just how ugly this is, is it really worth
> it?
It never was in my opinion but I lost that battle to Linus in 1.3.40 or
so timescales. Given how critical getppid _isnt_ I don't see the point
in being clever.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
