Re: memory resource accounting (was Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller)

On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 00:19 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>    This does give you kernel (slab, pagetable, etc) allocations as well as
>    userspace. I don't like the idea of doing controllers for inode cache
>    and controllers for dentry cache, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

Those two might not be such a bad idea.  Of the slab in my system, 90%
is reliably from those two slabs alone.  Now, a controller for the
'Acpi-Operand' slab might be going too far. ;)

Certainly something we should at least consider down the road.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: memory resource accounting (was Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller)
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • memory resource accounting (was Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller)
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: + sys_getppid-oopses-on-debug-kernel.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/3] add basic accounting fields to taskstats
• Previous by thread: memory resource accounting (was Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller)
• Next by thread: Re: memory resource accounting (was Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]