Andi Kleen <[email protected]> writes:
>> >
>> > However not that particular patch - i already changed that
>> > code in my tree because I needed really early per cpu for something and
>> > i had switched to using a static array for cpu0's cpudata.
>> >
>> > I will modify it to work like your proposal.
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>
> Actually i ended up going with your patch and dropping mine
> because of some other issues and I solved the problem
> that caused me to do the other in a different way.
Ok.
Since this is the agreed upon path, Andrew can you please pick
this patch up for the next -mm release?
Then the final practical question does it still make sense to decouple
the NR_IRQS from NR_CPUS? As my other patch was doing?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
