Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] cpumask: use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for new exports

On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> All the existing exports in lib/cpumask.c are EXPORT_SYMBOL() so I'd be
> inclined to make any new exports match that.
> 
> <edits the diffs>
> 
> OK?

Fine by me.

Greg.
-- 
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
I don't speak for SGI.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1 of 2] cpumask: use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for new exports
    • From: Greg Banks <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] cpumask: use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for new exports
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Bug in the RTM_SETLINK kernel API for setting MAC address
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] cpumask: use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for new exports
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] cpumask: use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for new exports
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]