Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY

> They are config characteristics (in many cases).  Hiding them in
> header files with dummy inlines or with ARCH_HAS_XYZZY is still
> hiding them IMO, although the inlines are better than the
> ARCH_HAS_XYZZY method.  I prefer to see them in the config space
> since I think that's where they belong.

That's just a different way to write a #define. You could as 
well keep the originals then.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
• Next by Date: [PATCH 2 of 2] cpumask: use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for new exports
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]