Re: [PATCH 3/3] uml: clean our set_ether_mac

On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote:
> From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[email protected]>
> 
> Clean set_ether_mac usage. Maybe could also be removed, but surely it can't be a
> global function taking a void* argument.
> 
> You may want to defer this patch to next kernel release.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[email protected]>

This one I can go along with :-)

Acked-by: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/3] uml: use -mcmodel=kernel for x86_64
    • From: "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 3/3] uml: clean our set_ether_mac
    • From: "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] uml: fix proc-vs-interrupt context spinlock deadlock
• Next by Date: Re: arm + sh cross compile suite for amd64 (i386)?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/3] uml: clean our set_ether_mac
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2/3] uml: fix proc-vs-interrupt context spinlock deadlock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]