Re: [PATCH] x86_64 dirty fix to restore dual command line store

On 8/7/06, Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]> wrote:

x86_64 dirty fix to restore dual command line store

Ok, It seems that the patch below effectivly removes the second
copy of the command line.  This means that any modification to the
'working' command line (as returned from setup_arch) is incorrectly
visible in userspace via /proc/cmdline.

Sorry for the side question but why is setup_arch adding things back
on the cmdline in the first place?  What do you see in /proc/cmdline?

Thanks,
 Keith
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] x86_64 dirty fix to restore dual command line store
    • From: "Keith Mannthey" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: x86_64 command line truncated II
    • From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] x86_64 dirty fix to restore dual command line store
    • From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [BUG] futex_handle_fault always fails.
• Next by Date: ext3 vs reiserfs speed (was Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion))
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86_64 dirty fix to restore dual command line store
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 dirty fix to restore dual command line store
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]