On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:26:29 +0000
Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > What more is needed that may be realistically expected from a kernel
> > > patch submission?
> >
> > We who accept the submission would be making a joke of the whole thing if
> > we accepted the assurances of a person who is concealing his/her identity.
> >
> > I suggested a simple solution: Perhaps one of the other project members
> > (ie: one who uses a real name) could also sign off the patches?
>
> I'm willing to sign off these patches. (In legal sense, anyway. I have
> not yet went through them carefully).
>
Thanks. So this will amount to Pavel asserting that this code is kosher,
based upon the knowledge which you've gained from participating in this
project.
I'll run that by Linus when he resurfaces.
And I'll duck this version of the patch series due to your code review
comments. Please cc me on version 2.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
