On Monday 07 August 2006 16:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> I consider it already questionable to split out a specific
> >> fault from the general die notification (previous users of the functionality all of the sudden won't get
> notifications
> >> for one of the most crucial faults anymore), but entirely hiding the functionality (unavailable without
> CONFIG_KPROBES,
> >> and even with it not getting exported) is really odd.
> >
> >You want to use it for your debugger?
>
> Yes, in its "light" form (i.e. without exception handling framework changes) it has to rely on this infrastructure.
Ok. I can make it unconditional and export it.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
