Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2

On 8/7/06, Edgar Toernig <[email protected]> wrote:

Why do we need [f]revoke at all?  As it doesn't implement the
BSD semantic I can't see why it's better than fuser -k.

Which part of the BSD semantics is that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
    • From: Edgar Toernig <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
    • From: Edgar Toernig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ProbableSpam] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]