Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Edgar Toernig" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:51:02 +0300
Cc: "Pavel Machek" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On 8/7/06, Edgar Toernig <[email protected]> wrote:

Why do we need [f]revoke at all?  As it doesn't implement the
BSD semantic I can't see why it's better than fuser -k.


Which part of the BSD semantics is that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: Edgar Toernig <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: Edgar Toernig <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [ProbableSpam] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux