On Monday 07 August 2006 10:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]> 06.08.06 20:56 >>>
> >We cannot unwind past kernel_thread_helper.
>
> Just as mentioned before - we shouldn't add endless special cases to the code that interprets the unwind
> information, but rather fix the unwind information so that it properly reflect the actual state. Like in the
> other case, the piece of code should be properly annotated, which would require it to be moved into
> an assembly file (it escapes me why code like that was ever placed in a C file).
I can do that.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]