Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86 paravirt_ops: binary patching infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



And a trivial warning fix on that last one when !CONFIG_PARAVIRT.

struct paravirt_patch is only defined for CONFIG_PARAVIRT, so we
declare the (unused) __start and __stop section markers as char, which
causes a warning when we pass them to the dummy apply_paravirt.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

--- working-2.6.18-rc3-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c.~1~	2006-08-07 14:33:13.000000000 +1000
+++ working-2.6.18-rc3-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c	2006-08-07 15:08:21.000000000 +1000
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
 extern struct paravirt_patch __start_parainstructions[],
 	__stop_parainstructions[];
 #else
-void apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch *start, struct paravirt_patch *end)
+void apply_paravirt(void *start, void *end)
 {
 }
 extern char __start_parainstructions[], __stop_parainstructions[];


-- 
Help! Save Australia from the worst of the DMCA: http://linux.org.au/law

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux