Re: Mismatch between hdaprm and sdparm output

On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:32 +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> NEC Versa S5200 laptop with FUJITSU MHV2080B SATA disk.  Kernel
> 2.6.16.21-0.13-smp (suselinux 10.1) using ata_piix.  hdparm and sdparm
> give inconsistent results, which one should I believe?  My main concern
> is write caching (XFS filesystem).

well write caching you should be able to benchmark easily.. does, say,
dbench or tiobench show any difference ?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Mismatch between hdaprm and sdparm output
    • From: Keith Owens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] raid1: allow user to force reads from a specific disk
• Next by Date: module-init-tools
• Previous by thread: Mismatch between hdaprm and sdparm output
• Next by thread: module-init-tools
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]