Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd

Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> and why not <resource_size_t> ?
>
>   

It would still need some casting someplace since we need to stuff the
address into two 8-bit fields when configuring the chip.

Rgds
Pierre

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
  - From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
  - From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
  - From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
Next by thread: [PATCH] [MMC] Another stray 'io' reference
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]