Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd

Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> and why not <resource_size_t> ?
>
>   

It would still need some casting someplace since we need to stuff the
address into two 8-bit fields when configuring the chip.

Rgds
Pierre

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix base address configuration in wbsd
• Next by thread: [PATCH] [MMC] Another stray 'io' reference
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]