On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 06:40:13PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:55:51AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:44:02PM +0300, Shem Multinymous wrote:
>
> > > Can you please be more specific? What purpose does this exclusion
> > > serve, that would be realistically achieved otherwise? You already
> > > have a GPL license from the author, and a way to contact and uniquely
> > > identify the author.
> >
> > For legal reasons, we need a way to to contact and identify the author
> > in the real world, not just in cyberspace, and a pseudonym doesn't
> > meet that requirement.
>
> In that context, even an anonymous mailer like gmail and the like is
> questionable. But, I'm sure one get a domain with faked address data
> in the whois database.
> Where would you draw the line?
I think that if we have the date, the name, and Gmail has the logs, it
should be enough to get back to the real persons in case of future legal
trouble. Anyway, it's clearly possible that many contributors already
post under pseudonyms which do not designate them in person. After all,
it is already more or less the case for all those with non-latin alphabets.
Perhaps the only thing we're missing is a list of validated mail account
providers ? Anyway, how do we now that someone hosted by local provider X
my be mapped to a physical person ?
Maybe we should only make the difference between "intentionnal anonymity"
and free mail accounts, if this is possible.
Regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
