I'm sorry about prev mail. I test on a wrong kernel.
The panic is not appear again, but random delete performance looks very bad.
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP
test 4G 50317 99 232444 54 109507 25 52287 98 329821 29
1169 2
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
/sec %CP
16 104 1 +++++ +++ 87 1 103 1 +++++ +++
100 1
test,4G,50317,99,232444,54,109507,25,52287,98,329821,29,1169.4,2,16,104,1,+++++,+++,87,1,103,1,+++++,+++,100,1
Tony.Ho wrote:
I'vs tested this patch, but the XFS panic is also reproducible, error
message is same as before.
Nathan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:22:21AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
I just hit a BUG that looks XFS related.
The machine is running 2.6.18-rc3-git3
(more info below the BUG messages)
Thanks for reporting, Jesper - is it reproducible? Could you try this
patch for me? We had a couple of other reports of this, but the earlier
reporters have vanished ... could you let me know if this helps?
cheers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]