On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 04:28:29PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > you can work around mutt's silly dependancy on atime by configuring it > with --enable-buffy-size. so far mutt is the only program i've discovered > which cares about atime. For the shell, atime is the difference between 'you have mail' and 'you have new mail'. I still don't understand though, how much does this really buy us over nodiratime? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: Valerie Henson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- References:
- [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: Valerie Henson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- From: dean gaudet <[email protected]>
- [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Turn rdmsr, rdtsc into inline functions, clarify names
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- Index(es):
 |