Re: [patch 3/8] Allow a kernel to not be in ring 0.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Ebbert wrote:
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:25:13 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

We allow for the fact that the guest kernel may not run in ring 0.
This requires some abstraction in a few places when setting %cs or
checking privilege level (user vs kernel).

I made some changes:

a. Added some comments about the SEGMENT_IS_*_CODE() macros.
b. Added a USER_RPL macro.  (You were comparing a value to a mask
   in some places and to the magic number 3 in other places.)
c. Changed the entry.S tests for LDT stack segment to use the macros.

These changes look great. Ack-ed. I had some similar ones before that never made it from my tree, as I got carried away and tried to unify the user descriptor conversion functions... someday I'll get to it again.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux