On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 11:32 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Okay... here is 6/5 patch..
>
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:15:50 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Maybe moving ioresouce collision check in early stage of add_memory() is good ?
> > > Yea. I am working a a full patch set for but my sparsemem and reserve
> > > add-based paths. It creates a valid_memory_add_range call at the start
> > > of add_memory. I should be posting the set in the next few hours.
> > >
> > Ah..ok. but I wrote my own patch...and testing it now..
> >
>
> This patch passed test with ia64. based on 5 patches already sent.
> plz check.
Looks good to me. Tested as works x86_64. It is required for the 4th
patch of this series.
Acked-by: Keith Mannthey <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
