Jes Sorensen wrote:
That's how the ABI is defined.That the ABI for long long or the ABI for uint64_t? Given that u64 is a Linux thing, it ought to be ok to do the alignment the right way within the kernel.
And what will break if you make that switch? -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- Index(es):
 |