BTW, to help to compare (as you noted above) here is the list of features provided by OpenVZ:
Could you point to a place where we can get a broken-down set of patches for OpenVZ or (even better), UBC ? For purposes of the resource management discussion, it will be useful to be able to look at the UBC patches in isolation and perhaps port them over to some common interface for testing comparing with other implementations. --Shailabh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- Prev by Date: [GIT] NFS client fixes for 2.6.18-rc3
- Next by Date: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- Next by thread: Re: [ProbableSpam] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
- Index(es):
 |