On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:00:43PM +0000, alessandro salvatori wrote:
> the new lock irq_lock is still static, but we now have preprocessor
> macros to be included from a header file instead of non-static functions in
> the same module as the static irq_lock.
I don't understand. The changes in this patch are -
remove two functions and their declarations
replace calls to those functions with spin_lock_irq_save and
spin_unlock_irqsave
move the spinlock declaration above the spin_(un)lock_irq_save
calls
Which of these are you talking about?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
