>
> Stupid questions:
> - Why do we still have a linux/config.h if it is totally redundant.
> - Why don't we have at least a #warning in linux/config.h that would
> tell us not to include it.
> - Why do we still have about 200 includes of linux/config.h in the
> kernel tree?
>
> I would much rather have a compile error, or at least a compile
> warning rather than needed a code review to notice this error.
In progress. As part of the ongoing header cleanup all include
<config.h> are being removed and a warning is included in config.h.
When the change was done I did not want to spew out thousands of warning
for a simple thing like this.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
