Suresh wrote:
> Paul, I will answer your questions on Suse bugzilla as that is a better
> forum than lkml.
Good idea.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- Prev by Date: initramfs: recursive lock detected
- Next by Date: Re: [ltp] Re: Generic battery interface
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
- Index(es):
 |