Re: [Patch] kernel memory leak fix for af_unix datagram getpeersec patch

From: Xiaolan Zhang <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:14:31 -0400

> I will remember this in the future, I promise.

Can you also remember to test your patches with CONFIG_SECURITY
disabled, as you also promised in the past several times?!??!?!

In file included from init/main.c:34:
include/linux/security.h: In function $,1rx(Bsecurity_release_secctx$,1ry(B:
include/linux/security.h:2757: warning: $,1rx(Breturn$,1ry(B with a value, in function returning void

I'll fix this one up, but this is getting rediculious.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch] kernel memory leak fix for af_unix datagram getpeersec patch
  - From: Xiaolan Zhang <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [Patch] kernel memory leak fix for af_unix datagram getpeersec patch
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] kernel memory leak fix for af_unix datagram getpeersec patch
  - From: Xiaolan Zhang <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] x86: rename is_at_popf(), add iret to tests and fix insn length
Next by Date: [rt7 x86_64] oops while running pounder
Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] kernel memory leak fix for af_unix datagram getpeersec patch
Next by thread: Re: [Patch] kernel memory leak fix for af_unix datagram getpeersec patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]