Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel

Hi Benjamin, Hi Pete,

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0700, Benjamin Cherian wrote:
> Hi Pete,
> 
> >How about now?
> 
> Much better! For me, everything seems to be working. No segfaults, and 
> everything seems to work.

That's very good news.

Pete, do you consider your work as appropriate for mainline ? In this
case, I can queue it for 2.4.34.

> Thanks,
> 
> Ben

Thanks guys,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Benjamin Cherian <[email protected]>
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Benjamin Cherian <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/4] UML - Move signal handlers to arch code
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.4 client - update d_cache when server reports ENOENT on an NFS remove
• Previous by thread: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
• Next by thread: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]