Re: [patch 1/3] add basic accounting fields to taskstats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shailabh Nagar wrote:
Jay Lan wrote:
Balbir Singh wrote:

Jay Lan wrote:

-#define TASKSTATS_VERSION 1
+#define TASKSTATS_VERSION    2
+#define TASK_COMM_LEN        16



We should find a way to keep this in sync with with the definition
in linux/sched.h (won't we a warning if both this header and
linux/sched.h are included together?)


I do not know how to sync it up. This header linux/taskstats.h is
meant to be included by userspace programs. If an application
happens to include linux/sched.h, which includes linux/time.h,
the application will very likely have compilation errors because
the "struct timespec" declaration in <linux/time.h> and <time.h>
are conflicting.

The <linux/acct.h> defines it to
#define ACCT_COMM    16

I can change our define to TS_COMM_LEN with remakes saying it
should be in sync with the TAKS_COMM_LEN defined in linux/sched.h.

This seems like a good enough way to do it. There's no real need for
the taskstats comm length to remain exactly in sync with the task struct's
comm length (by way of trying to include sched.h etc.) though avoiding the
compile error by renaming is desirable as Balbir pointed out.

Moreover, TASK_COMM_LEN in linux/sched.h isn't likely to change much -
if it increases and csa_acct users also really need the extra info provided, taskstats can always be changed and version bumped up. If the size decreases
there's no harm done (strncpy should be sufficient protection).

--Shailabh


I am not sure if there is a version of BUG_ON() for compile time
asserts. Basically, if we have an infrastructure of the form

/*
 * From C/C++ users journal November 2004
 */
#define STATIC_BUG_ON(e) 	\
	switch (0) {		\
	case  0:		\
	case (e):		\
		;		\
	}

Then the STATIC_BUG_ON() can catch as shown below.

#define TASK_COMM_LEN 	16
#define T_COMM_LEN	20

int
main(void)
{
	STATIC_BUG_ON(TASK_COMM_LEN == T_COMM_LEN);
}

STATIC_BUG_ON gives the following warning

bug_on_c.c: In function `main':
bug_on_c.c:19: duplicate case value
bug_on_c.c:19: previously used here

but with T_COMM_LEN set to 16

It compiles without any errors, the code generated also
looks like it has no overhead

int
main(void)
{
 8048310:       55                      push   %ebp
 8048311:       89 e5                   mov    %esp,%ebp
 8048313:       83 ec 08                sub    $0x8,%esp
 8048316:       83 e4 f0                and    $0xfffffff0,%esp
        STATIC_BUG_ON(TASK_COMM_LEN == T_COMM_LEN);
}
 8048319:       c9                      leave
 804831a:       c3                      ret
 804831b:       90                      nop


Assuming such infrastructure is available, you could then
do

#ifdef __KERNEL__
#include <linux/sched.h>
#define TS_COMM_LEN	16
STATIC_BUG_ON (TS_COMM_LEN == TASK_COMM_LEN);
#endif

Comments?

--

	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux