Kyle Moffett <[email protected]> writes: > IMHO the best alternative for a situation like that is a storage > controller with a battery-backed cache and a hunk of flash NVRAM for > when the power shuts off (just in case you run out of battery), as > well as a separate 1GB battery-backed PCI ramdisk for an external > journal device (likewise equipped with flash NVRAM). It doesn't take > much power at all to write a gig of stuff to a small flash chip > (Think about your digital camera which runs off a couple AA's), so > with a fair-sized on-board battery pack you could easily transfer its > data to NVRAM and still have power left to back up data in RAM for 12 > hours or so. That way bootup is fast (no reading 1GB of data from > NVRAM) but there's no risk of data loss. Not sure - reading flash is fast, but writing is quite slow. A digital camera can consume a set of 2 or 4 2500 mAh AA cells for a fraction of 1 GB (of course, only a part of power goes to flash). -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux
- From: "Wil Reichert" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux
- From: Ian Stirling <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux
- References:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Ulrich <[email protected]>
- Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Horst H. von Brand" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Adrian Ulrich <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view"expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view"expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view"expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Ian Stirling <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view"expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: sparsemem usage
- Next by Date: [Patch] kernel: bug fixing for kernel/kmod.c
- Previous by thread: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view"expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- Next by thread: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux
- Index(es):