Re: [PATCH 10 of 13] Change pte_clear_full to a more appropriately named pte_clear_not_present,

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_CLEAR_FULL
> -#define pte_clear_full(__mm, __address, __ptep, __full)			\
> +#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_CLEAR_NOT_PRESENT_FULL
> +#define pte_clear_not_present_full(__mm, __address, __ptep, __full)	\
>  do {									\
>  	pte_clear((__mm), (__address), (__ptep));			\
>  } while (0)

Needs comments I guess

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux