Re: let md auto-detect 128+ raid members, fix potential race condition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug  1, 2006, Michael Tokarev <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> []
>> If mdadm can indeed scan all partitions to bring up all raid devices
>> in them, like nash's raidautorun does, great.  I'll give that a try,

> Never, ever, try to do that (again).  Mdadm (or vgscan, or whatever)
> should NOT assemble ALL arrays found, but only those which it has
> been told to assemble.  This is it again: you bring another disk into
> a system (disk which comes from another machine), and mdadm finds
> FOREIGN arrays and brings them up as /dev/md0, where YOUR root
> filesystem should be.  That's what 'homehost' option is for, for
> example.

Exactly.  So make it /all/all local/, if you must.  It's the same as
far as I'm concerned.

> If initrd should be reconfigured after some changes (be it raid
> arrays, LVM volumes, hostname, whatever), -- I for one am fine
> with that.

Feel free to be fine with it, as long as you also let me be free to
not be fine with it and try to cut a better deal :-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Secretary for FSF Latin America        http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux