Re: deprecate and convert some sleep_on variants.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/1/06, Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
We've been carrying this for a dogs age in Fedora. It'd be good to get
this in -mm, so that it stands some chance of getting upstreamed at some point.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

diff -urNp --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux-1060/drivers/block/DAC960.c linux-1070/drivers/block/DAC960.c
--- linux-1060/drivers/block/DAC960.c
+++ linux-1070/drivers/block/DAC960.c
@@ -6132,6 +6132,9 @@ static boolean DAC960_V2_ExecuteUserComm
   unsigned long flags;
   unsigned char Channel, TargetID, LogicalDriveNumber;
   unsigned short LogicalDeviceNumber;
+  wait_queue_t __wait;
+
+  init_waitqueue_entry(&__wait, current);

   spin_lock_irqsave(&Controller->queue_lock, flags);
   while ((Command = DAC960_AllocateCommand(Controller)) == NULL)
@@ -6314,11 +6317,18 @@ static boolean DAC960_V2_ExecuteUserComm
                                        .SegmentByteCount =
            CommandMailbox->ControllerInfo.DataTransferSize;
          DAC960_ExecuteCommand(Command);
+         add_wait_queue(&Controller->CommandWaitQueue, &__wait);
+         set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);

Could this use prepare_to_wait()

+
          while (Controller->V2.NewControllerInformation->PhysicalScanActive)
            {
              DAC960_ExecuteCommand(Command);
-             sleep_on_timeout(&Controller->CommandWaitQueue, HZ);
+             schedule_timeout(HZ);
+             set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);

and schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() (which is redundant for the
first invocation, I suppose)

            }
+         current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
+         remove_wait_queue(&Controller->CommandWaitQueue, &__wait);

and finish_wait()?

Same for ibmtr.c ?

Also, would these changes:

diff -urNp --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux-1060/include/linux/wait.h linux-1070/include/linux/wait.h
--- linux-1060/include/linux/wait.h
+++ linux-1070/include/linux/wait.h

Be better in a separate patch?

Thanks,
Nish
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux