Re: [RFC] [PATCH] sysctl for the latecomers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:49:20AM -0400, Amit Gud wrote:
> /etc/sysctl.conf values are of no use to kernel modules that are inserted
> after init scripts call sysctl for the values in /etc/sysctl.conf
>
> For modules to use the values stored in the file /etc/sysctl.conf, sysctl
> kernel code can keep record of 'limited' values, for sysctl entries which
> haven't been registered yet. During registration, sysctl code can check
> against the stored values and call the appropriate strategy and proc_handler
> routines if a match is found.
>
> Attached patch does just that. This patch is NOT tested and is just to get
> opinions, if something like this is a right way of addressing this problem.
>
>
Hi,

One strange behaviour that comes to mind is the following:
1. I boot my machine so that it doesn't load module X
2. I modify /etc/sysctl.conf and I remove a line affecting module X
3. I modprobe X

Wouldn't the fact that the sysctl directive is applied anyway be a bit 
misleading?

Regards,
Frederik
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux