On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:54:47PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> >
> > This patch (b0423a0d9cc836b2c3d796623cd19236bfedfe63)
> >
> > [PATCH] Remove duplicate code in signal.c
> >
> > reverts a patch introduced by Linus long time back.
>
> Good catch.
>
> > Was this intentional?
> >
> > With the current mainline code, SIGSEGV inside a SIGSEGV handler will endup
> > in linux handling endless recursive faults.
> >
> > Just wondering if this has been discussed before and is intentional.
>
> It certainly wasn't discussed, and I don't think it was intentional. We
> should _not_ just unblock a blocked signal. We should kill the process,
> because sending the signal is actually very very wrong.
>
> Paul? Should I just revert, or did you have some deeper reason for it?
I cannot claim any deep thought on this one, so please do revert it.
Next time I submit a patch to code with which I am not intimately
familiar, I clearly need to carefully review the earlier patches. :-/
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
