> Ok, let's do it in the following way: > I present new version of kevent with new syscalls and fixed issues mentioned > before, while people look at it we can end up with mapped buffer design. > Is it ok? Yeah, that sounds good. I'm looking forward to seeing the next set of patches :). - z - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- Prev by Date: Re: [ltp] Re: Generic battery interface
- Next by Date: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- Next by thread: [take2 0/4] kevent: introduction.
- Index(es):
 |