Re: [patch] x86_64: fix is_at_popf() for compat tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
> How about checking for regs->cs != __USER_CS instead?  In 64-bit mode
> a program shouldn't have any other value there while in 32-bit mode
> it could be using LDT segments.


It could in theory, but it shouldn't agreed.  Added thanks.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux