Re: Preserving uptime with kexec?

["Nick Warne" <nick.warne@gmail.com>]

Speaking of which, I have submitted a claim to Guiness Book of Records
for my uptime on a lowly 486 box that serves my webpages (via NFS) as
a 'home user' (I am sure business classed machines do better with UPS
etc.).  I have posted here twice when it hit 1000 days and then 1500
days:

[nick@486Linux nick]$ uname -a
Linux 486Linux 2.2.13-7mdk #1 Wed Sep 15 18:02:18 CEST 1999 i486 unknown

[nick@486Linux nick]$ last -xf /var/run/utmp runlevel
runlevel (to lvl 3)                    Sun Oct 14 16:07 - 16:42 (1751+00:34)

The claim has been accepted, and is now in evaluation... so I dunno
what happens next until I hear from them (or how it can be verified
unless someone pops along and I telnet into the box for them).

Nick



On 31/07/06, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:59:13 EDT, Thomas Tuttle said:
> > Like many people, I like to brag about how great my uptime is.  But like
> > many other people, I like to keep my kernel up-to-date with the latest
> > and greatest from kernel.org.  I recently discovered the magic of kexec,
> > which allows me to switch kernels without rebooting for real.
> > Unfortunately, kexec resets my uptime when it runs.
>
> The reset of uptime is probably a Good Thing.  Consider the case of
> a kernel memory leak - you look in /proc/meminfo and find that you've
> managed
> to lose 64 meg of memory to the leak.  Where you start looking for the
> leak will depend on whether it's 64 meg lost across 4 weeks since the
> last boot, or the 30 minutes since the last boot.
>
> (Speaking as somebody who's run into both classes of leaks...)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/