Re: [Lhms-devel] [Patch] 3/5 in support of hot-add memory x86_64 arch_find_node x86_64

 
> I know it is defined in x86-64. But I mean that SRAT is not
> arch dependent. It is defined by just ACPI.
> However, each arch which uses ACPI has a own code to parse SRAT table.
> Is it hard to merge all of them? Are there any special case?

Node setup is architecture specific and quite different between x86-64
and ia64. I guess one could factor out some common sanity code though, but I'm 
not sure it is worth it. Iirc ia64 doesn't do much sanity checking because
they assume the firmware was written by sane people; x86-64 doesn't have
that luxury.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Patch] 3/5 in support of hot-add memory x86_64 arch_find_node x86_64
    • From: keith mannthey <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Lhms-devel] [Patch] 3/5 in support of hot-add memory x86_64 arch_find_node x86_64
    • From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: XFS Bug null pointer dereference in xfs_free_ag_extent
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix is_at_popf() for compat tasks
• Previous by thread: Re: [Lhms-devel] [Patch] 3/5 in support of hot-add memory x86_64 arch_find_node x86_64
• Next by thread: [Patch] 5/5 in support of hot-add memory x86_64 fix acpi motherboard.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]