Re: ipw3945 status

[Rene Rebe <rene@exactcode.de>]

Hi,

On Monday 31 July 2006 02:19, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 00:44 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ar Sul, 2006-07-30 am 23:02 +0200, ysgrifennodd Kasper Sandberg:
> > > or perhaps people should just not install/use stuff illegal in their
> > > country.
> > 
> > Most users really don't understand the issues around wireless and
> > country specific rules. Some wireless implementations also don't deal
> > with moving between countries live (as happens all the time today in
> > Europe).
> > 
> > That means as a distribution vendor its really important to ship people
> > something that by default does the right thing and the legal thing here.
> > If people want to recompile kernels or hack firmware thats their
> > business, but out of the box it should behave.
> as it will never do properly requiring a binary daemon, distributions
> are having a hard enough time to try and redistribute those firmwares
> where its legal, some even wont, but a userspace daemon is out of the
> question for most.

Sure not. That is why I wanted to direct the discussion in what country
enforcing scheme we should go.

-- 
  René Rebe - ExactCODE - Berlin (Europe / Germany)
  http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
  +49 (0)30 / 255 897 45
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/