Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the START_ARRAY ioctl for md

On Saturday July 29, [email protected] wrote:
> This patch contains the scheduled removal of the START_ARRAY ioctl for md.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Thanks.  I had a patch to do this queued up, but yours is more
thorough (mine didn't touch feature-removal-schedule.txt or
compat_ioctl.h)

Thanks.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC: 2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the START_ARRAY ioctl for md
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: fctnl(F_SETSIG) no longer works in 2.6.17, does in 2.6.16.
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4
• Previous by thread: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the START_ARRAY ioctl for md
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]