Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the START_ARRAY ioctl for md

On Saturday July 29, [email protected] wrote:
> This patch contains the scheduled removal of the START_ARRAY ioctl for md.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Thanks.  I had a patch to do this queued up, but yours is more
thorough (mine didn't touch feature-removal-schedule.txt or
compat_ioctl.h)

Thanks.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC: 2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the START_ARRAY ioctl for md
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: fctnl(F_SETSIG) no longer works in 2.6.17, does in 2.6.16.
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4
Previous by thread: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the START_ARRAY ioctl for md
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]