Nicholas Miell wrote: > [...] and was wondering > if you were familiar with the Solaris port APIs* and, I wasn't. > if so, you could > please comment on how your proposed event channels are different/better. There indeed is not much difference. The differences are in the details. The way those ports are specified doesn't allow much room for further optimizations. E.g., the userlevel ring buffer isn't possible. But mostly it's the same semantics. The ec_t type in my text is also better a file descriptor since otherwise it cannot be transported via Unix stream sockets. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>
- [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- Prev by Date: Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5
- Next by Date: Re: swsusp regression (s2dsk) [Was: 2.6.18-rc2-mm1]
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- Index(es):