[KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [0/3]

Hello all-
	I recently posted 11 patches to audit the handling of return codes for
calls made to kernel_thread.  I'd like to rescind those patches, in favor of the
following three, which take into account the feedback I've recieved on them.
Specifically these patches are redistributed to only be three patches rather
than 11, so that each patch fixes a class of problem that I found.  Also the
changes for delayed checks of return codes that don't consider negative returns
now properly check for >= 0 codes.  Finally added printks, all have the same
string format, to save space in the string table.

Thanks & Regards
Neil

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [3/3]
  - From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
- Re: [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [2/3]
  - From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
- Re: [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [1/3]
  - From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] [Patch] 4/5 in support of hot-add memory x86_64 fix kernel mapping code
Next by Date: Re: [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [1/3]
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/1] net: correct-Traffic-shaper-Kconfig
Next by thread: Re: [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [1/3]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]