Nikita Danilov wrote: > As you see, ext2 code already has multiple file "plugins", with > persistent "plugin id" (stored in i_mode field of on-disk struct > ext2_inode). Aha! So here's another question: Is it fair to ask Reiser4 to make its plugins generic, or should we be asking ext2/3 first?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: Łukasz Mierzwa <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- References:
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: "Horst H. von Brand" <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>
- Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- Prev by Date: Re: A better interface, perhaps: a timed signal flag
- Next by Date: Re: Building the kernel on an SMP box?
- Previous by thread: Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- Next by thread: Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
- Index(es):