On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:00:01PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Friday 28 July 2006 20:48, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 20:45 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > +ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
> > > > +CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0402, -fno-stack-protector)
> > > > +CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0402, -fstack-protector)
> > >
> > > Why can't you just use the normal call cc-option for this?
> >
> > this requires gcc 4.2; cc-option is not useful for that.
>
> The CC option thing is also very ugly.
The check is executed once pr. kernel compile - or at least once pr.
line. The reson to use cc-ifversion is that we need to check for a
specific gcc version and not just support for a specific argument type.
That said - checking for a version is not as reliable as checking if a
certain feature is really supported but Arjan suggested testing for
version >= 4.2 should do it.
Also we do not have any helpers in kbuild to do so -that could be worked
out so we could do something almost as elegant as
$(call cc-ifversion ...)
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
