Hua Zhong wrote:
>I remember someone said something along the lines of "Linux is evolution, not revolution". To me it seems unreasonable to put all
>the "revolutionary" VFS burden upon reiserfs team. It's not practical.
>
>
>
>
Thanks for saying that Hua. We have a guy named Nate Diller, who
probably could fix VFS up pretty nicely if Namesys did not have him
earning the consulting income the rest of the team lives on (he is doing
io scheduler work at the moment). That said, he would need a lot of
time, and stopping reiser4 inclusion to await his work merely ensures
his work will never happen.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
