Re: [patch 1/5] Add comments to the PDA structure to annotate offsets

On Friday 28 July 2006 18:03, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Subject: [patch 1/5] Add comments to the PDA structure to annotate offsets
> From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

So why exactly do you think these numbers need to be documented?

If there is a reason there should be a comment in the code.

Nobody should use fixed numbers, but always get the current ones
from asm-offset

-Andi

> Change the comments in the pda structu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 1/5] Add comments to the PDA structure to annotate offsets
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 1/5] Add comments to the PDA structure to annotate offsets
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] DMI: Decode and save OEM String information
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2/5] Add the Kconfig option for the stackprotector feature
• Previous by thread: [patch 1/5] Add comments to the PDA structure to annotate offsets
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/5] Add comments to the PDA structure to annotate offsets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]