Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel

Hi Pete,
Thanks for the reply.
> By the way, you didn't tell me if you tried to use alarm(2) across
> submitted URBs. This is the technique ADSL modem drivers use. They
> also have to have input and output streams running simultaneously.

I'm making a library to operate my device, and I don't want to use alarm, 
because the user might need to use alarm in his own applications.

Thanks again,
Ben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Benjamin Cherian <[email protected]>
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linguistic fixes for Documentation/kbuild/
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Use BUG_ON(foo) instead of "if (foo) BUG()" in include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h
• Previous by thread: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
• Next by thread: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]