RE: [patch] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizare

> > If there's a better way to hop to a specific core, I'll 
> gladly rewrite 
> > the code in question.
> 
> You could use smp_call_function_single() 
> 
> (i386 version might be only in -mm* so far)

I'll wait and submit for 2.6.20, I guess.

-Mark Langsdorf
AMD, Inc.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [patch] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizare
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
Next by Date: Re: [patch 2/5] Add the Kconfig option for the stackprotector feature
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizare
Next by thread: Re: [patch] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizare
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]