Matthias Andree wrote: >I wonder what makes the hash overflow issue so complicated (other than >differing business plans, that is) that upgrading in place isn't >possible. Changes introduce instability, but namesys were proud of their >regression testing - so how sustainable is their internal test suite? > > > Never met a test suite the equal of a few million users..... People have this image of Namesys as some large corporation that has large resources. We just barely are going to be able to ship reiser4, at the cost of a LOT of financial pain. We can't afford to go in two directions at once. We can add bugfixes to V3, but adding features, I have to tell you that we ain't got the staff for both that and shipping V4. Our whole corporation has a budget about what most corporations spend on two programmers. We have 5 developers, including me, and making little bits of money is a constant distraction from the main work. Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Matt Heler <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Grzegorz Kulewski <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Hello, We have IP100A Linux driver need to submit to 2.6.x kernel
- Next by Date: [PATCH] knfsd: Fix stale file handle problem with subtree_checking.
- Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):
 |