Hi Frederik,
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc2/2.6.18-rc2-mm1/
> >
>
> I think that the bluetooth-guard-bt_proto-with-rwlock.patch introduced the following
> BUG:
> [ 43.232000] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2903
> [ 43.232000] in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
> [ 43.232000] [<c0104114>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x197/0x1ba
> [ 43.232000] [<c010415e>] show_trace+0x27/0x29
> [ 43.232000] [<c010426e>] dump_stack+0x26/0x28
> [ 43.232000] [<c011ad1c>] __might_sleep+0xa2/0xaa
> [ 43.232000] [<c0173085>] __kmalloc+0x9c/0xb3
> [ 43.232000] [<c02f9295>] sk_alloc+0x1bc/0x1de
> [ 43.232000] [<c036d689>] hci_sock_create+0x42/0x8a
> [ 43.236000] [<c0366f40>] bt_sock_create+0xb5/0x154
> [ 43.236000] [<c02f69dc>] __sock_create+0x131/0x356
> [ 43.236000] [<c02f6c2f>] sock_create+0x2e/0x30
> [ 43.236000] [<c02f6c88>] sys_socket+0x27/0x53
> [ 43.240000] [<c02f7db5>] sys_socketcall+0xa9/0x277
> [ 43.240000] [<c0103131>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
> [ 43.240000] [<b7f38410>] 0xb7f38410
the comment from Max Krasnyansky (the original author) I got was this:
As far as I remember there was some upper level locking that ensured
that protected registration stuff. But it's been awhile so I may be
completely wrong.
And Masatake YAMATO mentioned:
It seems that lock_kernel/unlock_kernel was used in sys_init_module.
However, now it is gone.
I haven't looked at the new module loading code to verify if we really
need to protect our socket registration or not.
Regards
Marcel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]