Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

Citerar Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>:

> If _Bool does end up in the user-kernel ABI, be advised that validating
> them will be tricky ("b == true || b == false" or "!!b" won't work), and

Why would !!b not work?
I don't think it should end up in the ABI (at least, not yet). Just asking
because I'm curious. :)

> Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>

/Richard Knutsson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
    • From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
    • From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH -rt] NMI-safe mb- and atomic-free RT RCU
• Next by Date: Re: Kubuntu's udev broken with 2.6.18-rc2-mm1
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]